http://blogs.liverpooldailypost.co.uk/businessbeat/

Downing was RIGHT to extract maximum value from new museum project

By Tony McDonough on Feb 25, 10 04:14 PM

The fuss over National Museums Liverpool having to fork out £750,000 to property firm Downing to ensure building work could start on the Museum of Liverpool is predictable.

But I think Downing was completely in the right and should be applauded for giving the city a much-needed lesson in how the world of business works.

During the planning process for the museum it was discovered that the sight line between the Port of Liverpool Building, owned by Downing, and the former dock offices was protected by a covenant dating back to 1963 ...

The new museum obscures that view and NML was forced to negotiate with Downing to have the covenant lifted. The company insisted NML pay £750,000, which it did.

As we would expect from the so-called business-friendly city Downing has come under fire for its stance.

In my view, Downing was in the right. It had something NML wanted, it set a price it considered reasonable and NML paid up. That's business.

I've written on this blog before that Liverpool needs to start getting its head around how business works.

We always seem to have our hand out - we wanted £20m extra for Capital of Culture, more than £400m for the ridiculous Merseytram folly and wanted the Government to disregard competition rules and allow our partly state-funded cruise liner terminal to be able to compete with private ones.

We need more entrepreneurial companies like Downing driving our economy forward and fewer public sector handouts for grandiose projects.

The new Museum of Liverpool is a fantastic scheme but museums don't drive economies. That's the job of the private sector.

Downing has invested tens of millions of pounds in this city on commercial property projects that will help bring inward investment. The money they got from NML can only help them do more of that.

They are a great Liverpool business success story and should be applauded, not criticised.

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

This is to help prevent spamming and confirm you are a human

 

Keep up to date

Categories

Archives

Sponsored Links