Signs of strains after Liverpool Liberal Democrat leadership challenge

By David Bartlett on May 18, 10 08:48 AM in

Defeated Liverpool Liberal Democrat leadership challenger Paula Keaveney tried to insist to me last night that the party is not divided.

Forget the fact she challenged Warren Bradley and only lost be three votes, forget that it was the second such challenge in as many years, forget even that the party had lost control of Liverpool council for the first time in 12 years to Labour.

Those things alone would be enough to suggest the the party is divided.

There are some other indicators of the divisions that now rack the official opposition in Liverpool.

To start with it is worth taking a look at part of Cllr Bradley's statement after the leadership vote last night:

"I had a lot to deal with in the last four years, after the fallout between Mike Storey and David Henshaw I had to pick up the pieces.

"So I think it would have been wrong if I had not been given the opportunity to remain as leader."

Mentioning this will be seen by many as a sign of strains between the leader and his one time mentor.

But more fundamentally at the moment the party does not seem able to agree on why it lost the election and how it should move forward.

Some believe the their loss was mainly because of an increased turnout due to the general election being held on the same day as the locals. Which effectively means the party's previous success has been borne out of the fact not as many people normally bother voting in locals.

While that may have been the reality, some wonder whether relying on low turnout can really be seen as a proper election strategy. They believe the high turnout merely accelerated the party's rate of decline that will continue in future elections unless there is a change of strategy.

It is hard to imagine the Liberal Democrats sweeping back into power next year or the year after. Labour won 20 seats earlier this month, those seats will not be in contention until 2014.

I would expect Labour to possibly add five seats to its ranks next year.

The Lib Dems must rebuild if they are to be in a serious position to challenge Labour's control in a couple of years time. But first they need to agree on what went wrong, and how to fix it.

3 Comments

katie54 said:

The many idiotic statements by Warren Bradley are a big part of the reason the Lib Dems lost the election. How exactly is he going to hold the government to account? That's what our MPs will be doing. Why on earth would they listen to him? He was elected to represent his ward and to provide hopefully constructive opposition to the Labour Council. But he appears to be far too arrogant, ignorant and thick to even understand that's what he should be doing. It is amazing and depressing that he has survived.

And yes, the high turnout didn't help the LibDems, but that, in many cases, was precisely the point. My constituency is a very safe Labour seat, always has been, always will be. So I didn't particularly need to vote. But I definitely wanted the LibDems out of the Council and was delighted to have played a part in getting rid of them.
The main reason - Liverpool Direct, Liverpool Direct, Liverpool Direct.

Robin Brown said:

Do the Lib Dems in Liverpool understand how much their image has been tarnished by the last few years?

Warren Bradley seems to be aware that he's associated with the fallout of Henshaw versus Storey, but doesn't see a problem with remaining the public face of the LibDems in Liverpool? Hmm.

cattypus said:

Thank you Warren...your ego is your weakness. The fact you think of how things affect YOU and not the electorate is your downfall...the fact you don't see this is the reason you can do nothing about it...you are in denial, and that renders you a blind man and therefore powerless.

You seem to think you are'owed' something by the City, and that personal posterity matters...It doesnt.

Sadly you have rendered yourself a failure, but you cant comprehend it. Sad for you, but not for Labour. Thank you thank you Warren...keep it up. Liverpool Labour needs you ....

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

This is to help prevent spamming and confirm you are a human

 

Dale Street Associates

David Bartlett

David Bartlett

City editor of the Post and Echo covering politics, regeneration, and urban affairs.
Read My Posts »

Follow us on Twitter

SPONSORED LINKS