Guest blog: Tony Caldeira finally finishes his Conservative party conference diary

By David Bartlett on Oct 15, 10 09:42 PM in

tony_caldeira_hs.jpgTony Caldeira, is a busy man. As well as being chairman of the Liverpool Conservatives he also runs a successful cushion manufacturing empire.

Here he finally finishes off his Conservative party conference diary, better late than never.

Tuesday morning and another busy day ahead. Lots on the conference agenda today with sessions on public services, crime, welfare reform and cutting global poverty.

First though for Liverpool Conservatives there is a meeting with senior volunteers from Conservative Central Office. The tone is positive following the improvement in the performance of the Conservative Party in Liverpool at the general election in 2010.

Across the five constituencies in Liverpool the Conservative Party increased its vote by over 50% on May 6th. At the same time the Liberal Democrat general election vote in the city fell slightly, despite the increased turnout. A significant swing.

This increase was due to the changes made to the Party by David Cameron, the work done by Chris Grayling MP as "Shadow Minister for Merseyside", lots of hard work from the team of local candidates and an excellent contribution from our activists and Conservative Future. Oh, and we were also helped by the worst outgoing Labour Government ever!

In the main hall first Theresa May and then Iain Duncan Smith are the key contributors. IDS steals the show with his plans for welfare reform and his proposals to simplify the benefits system.

Welfare reform will not be easy but it is the right thing to do. Living on benefits cannot be a lifestyle choice, however the most vulnerable in society must be protected. This is a difficult balance which I believe the former Party leader will get right.

Being trapped on benefits is a personal disaster for those concerned, a huge barrier for social mobility and a huge drain on our economy. The coalition must make work pay, both for people stuck on benefits and for the future competitiveness of the British economy. IDS's expensive and radical plans are further proof that despite the economic mess it inherited, the coalition is proving to be a radical and reforming government.

Meanwhile, outside the hall, the BBC are looking for a first time conference "virgin" to take part in a TV interview on the "cuts" agenda. Liverpool's Paul Athans, who was the candidate for Cressington ward in the local elections, volunteers to be grilled by the beeb's Huw Edwards for News 24.

We chat through the likely questions beforehand, come up with some appropriate answers and Paul is prepared. The BBC's three victims are in place and the cameras are ready to roll.

Suddenly the presenter hears from his producer that the subject has now changed and the discussion will be on the proposed cuts in child benefits to top rate tax payers! Thanks for the warning guys!

There are a few Liverpool Tories are in the wings giving moral support and we are now a bit nervous. Our Liverpool University Conservative Future Chair has had no time to prepare for the new topic.

He gets through the first question without any hiccups and we all breathe a sigh of relief. Later in the piece the discussion comes back to Paul and Huw Edwards pulls no punches. "The Conservatives want to scrap universal benefits but your Lib Dem coalition partners do not. Surely Paul this will lead to splits in the coalition?" Oooh, tricky.

We all hold our breath.

Well not necessarily, says Paul. I went to a fringe meeting at the Lib Dem Conference in Liverpool (Good plug lad) where Vince Cable was speaking. He said it was ridiculous that a cabinet minister on a six figure salary still receives the winter fuel allowance, so Conservatives and Liberal Democrats are in agreement here.

You little beauty! Turns out that Paul was the only Tory amongst the thousands at conference who had that anecdotal line. City of Liverpool Conservatives One, British Broadcasting Corporation Nil.

I'm perfectly comfortable with top rate taxpayers not receiving state benefits. This inefficient and unnecessary redistribution of wealth is inappropriate in the times in which we live. Benefits should be targeted at the most needy in society and used as a safety net, not as additional income for top rate taxpayers.

The last evening is upon us and most of the team are feeling the effects of three long days, so we decide to have a relatively quiet one and just chill out in the Hyatt for the last time. Unfortunately for me, the new Fabric Warehouse store opening in Norwich is behind schedule and I'm going to have to leave early on Wednesday morning to hurry things along (which also leads to a delay in this year's final conference blog, apologies to all).

The last day on Wednesday is dominated by firstly the Foreign Affairs and Defence session in the morning and then by the leaders speech in the afternoon.

Defence is very important to Conservatives and I believe that the defence of the United Kingdom is the first priority of any British government.

The commitment to our nuclear deterrent, "our ultimate insurance policy" is rightly reaffirmed. Our troops are thanked and rewarded for their service with extra operational allowances. Thankfully, we finally have a government which appreciates the immense sacrifices made by our armed forces and their families.

We must never forget that we are a country at war. Never.

On foreign policy William Hague delivers... well, William Hague delivers! - as always.

But the highlight of the day, if not the conference, is the leader's speech. There is inevitably a huge queue in Birmingham as the faithful patiently wait to hear the Prime Minister. Many are frustrated that the hall is far too small for the occasion. (Not a problem at ACC Liverpool!) Meanwhile in Norwich yours truly catches it on TV.

David Cameron looks and sounds like a Prime Minister who understands the mood of his Party and the mood of his country. There are no triumphant noises, no celebratory rhetoric, just a sober realisation of the difficult road which lies ahead for his government.

He opens his speech very deliberately and very humbly, saying that it is "An honour and a privilege"...to be before... "the Party that I lead, in front of the country that I love."

He praised the bravery of Nick Clegg, as both men created a strong, stable government, each putting the needs of their country before the needs of their Party. He also praised the work of the coalition, listing some of its early achievements saying "Look at what we've done in five months, imagine what we can do in five years!"

I don't believe the Prime Minister is in any way looking forward to the necessary cuts his
government will have to make. He summed it up perfectly. "I wish there was another way. I wish there was an easier way. But there is no other responsible way."

There was also a warning to his own Party and a message to the country, especially for the middle classes, with regards to cuts. The PM was very clear, saying "Those with the broadest shoulders should take their share of the load."

With this progressive and fair message of "one nation" Conservatism, David Cameron firmly planted his government's flag in the middle ground of British politics. The Conservative Party's journey to the centre is now complete.

Then of course came the rousing ending. The speech was a call for collective action and was almost one of a wartime Prime Minister. Appropriate in many ways as the last Labour Government left the nation's finances in a position not seen since the war.

Cameron finished with a crescendo, "Let's pull together." He cried. "Let's come together." He urged, "Let's work together - in the national interest."

Cameron's determined performance was greeted with the inevitable standing ovation which was well deserved. This was a speech of a man who understands the challenge ahead and is prepared to take the difficult decisions which will mend our broken country. He is the right man, in the right place, at the right time.

10 Comments

Ronnie de Ramper said:

And Esther McVey? Did I miss the reference to the region's only Tory MP? Surely she must have got a mention somewhere. Tony? Was Esther McVey at conference? Did she speak? Or do anything? I mean, Any Thing?

Ronnie's lonely said:

What do you do Ronnie?

Libertarian said:

So BBC turned tables on evil Tory devil split second before cameras roll ha ha ha so BBC is still loyal party servant - is good no? Is Mirracle of scratching back yes! if you scratch party worker back once then whole party scratch your back – if you scratch back 2 times then get 4 times back scratch, 4 times gets you 8 times, pretty soon whole back is red raw but is nice no!
Same with BBC people’s party load BBC up with free money so can pay for big salary and little extra luxuries to directors and cronies so to keep it going then BBC secretly support Peoples Party - everyone is heppy no? On this occasion Tory Devil too clever for BBC but next time they get him.
Same thing also for benefits peoples. Peoples party are nice kind caring party like Christmas Santa giving out benefits to all peoples - all peoples are grateful and think only can have benefits not job so they vote for Peoples Party keep party in power – people think that party are scratching their back but really Party is making them depend on Party so they scratch Party’s back at voting time. If party stay in power real progress can be made and hard work for loyal party workers can be rewarded. Is miracle no? In end though Country in bankrupt and go back to olden days when nobody can afford shoes or food – is future problem so not matter now while good times roll - simples
Hope Tory Devils don’t realise this and decide to scratch voters back as well

back to the 80's said:

tony, there was nothing wrong with the BBC asking a question about child benefit - do you want them to write your answers as well

Cameron is a frightening man- total control merchant who only bows down ( a la thatcher) when he knows he's beaten eg the defence chiefs marching into Downing st in full uniform - making it plain they werent having all his cuts- a tory pm cant be seen to go against the military.

whats being proposed will hurt so many of the low/average waged- hardly a mention of the tax evading rich , more effort to close a few loopholes would raise far more than the war on benefit cheats and with a lot less time and effort.

and Tony dont forget NO PARTY won the election - you really dont have a mandate for this - although as with the LDs on tuition fees , manifestos aged 5 months can be ripped up in a second-
and Clegg Brave - absolutely sickening to see a comment like that - the word COALITION wasnt on mine or anyone elses ballot paper- he sold his soul for a red book and a few pet projects - shame on you for praising him as some kind of national hero

New Labour Victim said:

Dear back to the 80's
There is one key fundamental wrong assumption conclusion in your logic here:

"whats being proposed will hurt so many of the low/average waged- hardly a mention of the tax evading rich , more effort to close a few loopholes would raise far more than the war on benefit cheats and with a lot less time and effort."

Are you crazy enough to think any government wants to impose this on anyone?

This is being done wholly and solely because of the mess that this government inherited from Brown and Blair - I bet Cameron/ Clegg would have loved to come to power and got the handouts going - No as usual though someboday has to come in and clean up Labours mess all over again - dont pretend that the lies and deceit could have gone on a second longer than when the curtain came down on the New Labour car crash.

back to the 80's said:

nobodys saying the deficit didnt need dealing with. you cant claim Labour ignored that at election time

the deficit was caused by Bankers stupidity and recklessness- deny that if you dare !!!!! - and even Cameron praised Brown in 2007/08 for the way it was dealt with- and that is UNDENIABLE.

As for Cam/Clegg wanting to do it - entirely questionable as of course they are doing it and Clegg has ripped up his manifesto pledges in its course - so in his case he appears to be most willing politically

I ask you again - where was the endorsement from the electorate to do this - it wasnt there- these cuts are too savage and will hurt those who cant absorb them most- there is always an alternative!!!!- i would suggest that the tories as they did under Thatcher will hit the low paid and poor hardest for one simple reason - they have nothing to lose electorally there as they either dont vote tory/lib dem or more likely are amongst the 35 per cent of the electorate who didnt even bother to vote in may

and a word of caution NLV - you cant go on blaming previous governements ad infinitum - the CON/DEMS are responsible for whats being proposed and they are THEIR actions - they have to answer for them

Libertarian said:

I don’t know about NLV but I dare!

As I have said previously Bankers were just doing what they were paid to do. I don’t know, they may well be vile and disgusting greedy pigs but thats what they are paid to do and they did their job well – we pay politicians to set policy and oversee regulators what were you doing when you should have been doing your job?

What are you bleating on about endorsement here for ? the piggy bank is empty and the overdraft has been called in – the coalition are having to take on the unpleasant job of tidying up your mess now how can you pretend that you can find a few bob on the last credit card that hasn’t been cut up to make life a teeny weeny bit comfier before the bailiffs come to turn the gas and electric off.

Get real for goodness sake!

back to the 80's said:

Nice to see the old tory/lib attitude doesnt change despite the spin from Cameron and clegg- youre defence of the bankers is as bad as it gets - your description of them being good at their jobs is a bit odd- lots of poor lending choices - lending above security valuations and 3 of them ending up nationalised - yes 5 star performances id say- and given the tories de-regulated the city in the 80s dont blame any subdequent government for that catastrophic error of judgement

the GNP of this country allows it to get the credit it does from world financial centres even if its pricey- so your piggy bank analogy is dismissed with the contempt it deserves- econonmic management had to improve but the social price the tory/libdems are going to make us pay is whats wrong and you and your laissez faire attitude is what is most unpleasant

Libertarian said:

I am not a TORY but Tories did indeed deregulate – they gave the old school tie brigade some competition and allowed others from less privileged backgrounds into the investment houses of the City of London ie they spread opportunity around for all who wanted it – weren’t they truly awful!

Tories also put control and regulation in the hands of the Bank of England and that worked very well for years. Then good old Crash Gordon came on the scene and scrapped the Bank of England responsibility and control and also and created a whole new feckless money wasting quango called the Financial Services Agency (probably loyal party workers) and put them in control ..... enough said except that he was also selling the Nation’s gold at the bottom of the market at the same time!

To obtain and maintain their banking licence FROM THEIR REGULATOR, bankers have to comply with, amongst other things, the capital ratio and reserve requirements, corporate governance, large and related party exposure restrictions all set, monitored by their REGULATOR. REGULATORS in turn are governed BY the GOVERNMENT - Bankers may be greedy pigs but I’ll say it again in case you didn’t hear before – they did their jobs – why didn’t you in NEW LABOUR do yours?

back to the 80's said:

Well Liberterian you can claim youre not a tory but your economic theories are straight out of the Alan Walters mould and they dont look out of place in the TEA PARTY - currently fomenting hatred in the USA-

The bankers job isnt to lose money - which you cant deny and left us the taxpayer to bail them out- THEY FAILED AT THEIR JOB - anyone can see that- and they should take their full share of the blame - Nobody forced them to make ridiculous loans or gambles and no shareholder of RBS forced Goodwin to bid for ABN when Barclays had all but done the deal- it was pure naked greed and you come on here and not just defend it - you seem to be suggesting it was the governments fault- your position is almost laughable

Labour made lots of mistakes - and they would have probably had to do something similar to what Osbornes doing - but it wouldnt have been at the reckless speed its been done- We wont agree on the blame game for the deficit so lets call a truce on that -

but have the good grace to admit that this is an attack on those least able to take the financial pain and that every govt must take responsibility for WHAT IT DOES and cant blame predecessors during the whole of the parliamentary term theyre in power- The tories and more relevantly the Lib dems deserve to have to answer for these dreadful cuts that THEY are implementing

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

This is to help prevent spamming and confirm you are a human

 

Dale Street Associates

David Bartlett

David Bartlett

City editor of the Post and Echo covering politics, regeneration, and urban affairs.
Read My Posts »

Follow us on Twitter

SPONSORED LINKS